Investigating mass loss processes on Khumbu Glacier, Nepal

Duncan Quincey, Owen King, Cameron S. Watson
2017
This is a Reduced Scientific Report resulting from NERC Geophysical Equipment Facility Minor Loan 1050, principal investigator Dr Duncan Quincey.

Summary

Our project set out to generate 2.5-3D topographic models using both satellite and ground-based methods. King was focussing on detecting glacial lake development using remote sensing. Previous work has suggested that certain conditions exist under which glacial lake formation may be favourable. He had three objectives:

1. To identify glaciers that have experienced significant mass loss and surface lowering over multi-decadal timescales;

2. To identify glaciers where surface slope has decreased below a threshold value of degrees and where areas of reverse glacier surface slope may exist; and

3. To identify glaciers that show negligible or no flow over large parts of their surface.

He therefore generated DEMs of Difference using stereoscopic satellite imagery acquired by the ALOS PRISM, ASTER and SPOT sensors and needed GCPs to generate the models and to provide check-point data. Watson was using remote sensing and field-based surveying methods to quantify the importance of supraglacial pond development and associated ice cliff melt to the surface water storage budget of debris-covered glaciers. In the field he focussed on generating multitemporal topographic models of backwasting (melting) ice-cliffs using Structure-from-Motion, as well as measuring pond bathymetry and its seasonal variability. He therefore also needed GCPs to generate the SfM models and to provide check-point data.

Research facilitated by this loan

King gathered more than 50 ground control points and check-points that have allowed him to create multi-temporal DEMs over the glaciers in our study area. He has shown that the glaciers have negative mass balance and that those with a terminal lake are more heavily in recession that those without. This work has recently been published in The Cryosphere (doi:10.5194/tc-11-407-2017). He is currently working on making multi-temporal slope calculations that will allow him to interpret the impact of glacier recession on lake development potential. Watson gathered more than 450 ground control points and check-points over several seasons, which have allowed him to validate satellite-based assessments of supraglacial water storage (published in Global and Planetary Change in 2016; doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2016.04.008), characterise the dynamics of ice-cliffs (published in Geomorphology in 2017; doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.11.017) and quantify mass-loss at exposed ice-cliff faces (currently in review with Journal of Glaciology).

Survey Methodology and Data Processing

High-contrast temporary ground control points (GCPs) were distributed around each ice cliff (number of GCPs = 6-15 per cliff) and across stable terrain throughout the Khumbu Valley (n = 45) and surveyed using the Leica GS10. Each GCP was occupied in static mode for up to 10 minutes. A base station was located on the lateral moraine of the glacier < 2 km from our survey sites for the duration of each field campaign and was set to record each day. The GPS data were post-processed in Leica GeoOffice. Our GNSS base station data were post-processed against the Syangboche permanent base station (27.8142N, 86.7125E) located ~20 km from our field site using GPS and GLONASS satellites. Our field GCPs were then adjusted with reference to the field base station data following a relative carrier phase positioning strategy using Leica GeoOffice software and satellite ephemeris information accessed after GCP acquisition. The mean 3-D positional uncertainty was 4.8 mm across all our GCPs (n = 523).

Project Outcomes

The Leica GS10 units were excellent - there were no issues with them at any point in our work, and thanks to the training from GEF staff in Edinburgh we had no issues acquiring the data in the field. The post-processed data are accurate to within several centimetres, and the loan has directly led to three published papers in high-impact journals, with another currently in review. The data collected during this project and supported by the loan have partly also led to a successful Standard Grant application to continue working at this site.

Outputs

Watson, C.S., Quincey, D.J., Carrivick, J.L. and Smith, M.W., 2017. Ice cliff dynamics in the Everest region of the Central Himalaya. Geomorphology, 278, pp.238-251.

Watson, C.S., Quincey, D.J., Carrivick, J.L. and Smith, M.W., 2016. The dynamics of supraglacial ponds in the Everest region, central Himalaya. Global and Planetary Change, 142, pp.14-27.

King, O., Quincey, D. J., Carrivick, J. L., and Rowan, A. V., 2017. Spatial variability in mass loss of glaciers in the Everest region, central Himalayas, between 2000 and 2015. The Cryosphere, 11, 407-426.

Watson, C.S., Quincey, D.J., Carrivick, J.L., Smith, M.W., Rowan, A.V. and James, M. In Review. Quantifying ice cliff evolution with multi-temporal point clouds on the debris-covered Khumbu Glacier, Nepal. Journal of Glaciology.

Data Archiving

All of the dGPS data will be archived in the National Geoscience Data Centre (http://www.bgs.ac.uk/services/ ngdc/). We are currently preparing the metadata and the .csv file and will transfer them both before Easter.

References

None

Figure 1

NERC GEF Report 1050 - Figure 1

Figure 1 - The Khumbu Glacier and the locations of the 523 ground control points collected during this project and two subsequent field campaigns.


Back Back to the list of GEF reports